7.3 Power Cone Optimization¶
The structure of a typical conic optimization problem is
(see Sec. 12 (Problem Formulation and Solutions) for detailed formulations). Here we discuss how to set-up problems with the primal/dual power cones.
MOSEK supports the primal and dual power cones, defined as below:
Primal power cone:
\[\POW_n^{\alpha_k} = \left\{ x\in \real^n ~:~ \prod_{i=0}^{n_\ell-1} x_i^{\beta_i} \geq \sqrt{\sum_{j=n_\ell}^{n-1}x_j^2},\ x_0\ldots,x_{n_\ell-1}\geq 0 \right\}\]where \(s = \sum_i \alpha_i\) and \(\beta_i = \alpha_i / s\), so that \(\sum_i \beta_i=1\).
Dual power cone:
\[(\POW_n^{\alpha_k}) = \left\{ x\in \real^n ~:~ \prod_{i=0}^{n_\ell-1} \left(\frac{x_i}{\beta_i}\right)^{\beta_i} \geq \sqrt{\sum_{j=n_\ell}^{n-1}x_j^2},\ x_0\ldots,x_{n_\ell-1}\geq 0 \right\}\]where \(s = \sum_i \alpha_i\) and \(\beta_i = \alpha_i / s\), so that \(\sum_i \beta_i=1\).
Perhaps the most important special case is the three-dimensional power cone family:
which has the corresponding dual cone:
For example, the conic constraint \((x,y,z)\in\POW_3^{0.25,0.75}\) is equivalent to \(x^{0.25}y^{0.75}\geq |z|\), or simply \(xy^3\geq z^4\) with \(x,y\geq 0\).
For other types of cones supported by MOSEK, see Sec. 14.8 (Supported domains) and the other tutorials in this chapter. Different cone types can appear together in one optimization problem.
7.3.1 Example POW1¶
Consider the following optimization problem which involves powers of variables:
We convert (7.3) into affine conic form using auxiliary variables as bounds for the power expressions:
The two conic constraints shown in (7.4) can be expressed in the ACC form as shown in (7.5):
(7.5)¶\[\begin{split}\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}1&0&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1&0\\0&0&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0&1\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}x_0\\x_1\\x_2\\x_3\\x_4\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\\0\\1\\0\end{array}\right] \in \POW^{0.2,0.8}_3 \times \POW^{0.4,0.6}_3.\end{split}\]
We start by creating the optimization model:
with Model('pow1') as M:
We then define the variable x
corresponding to the original problem (7.3), and auxiliary variables appearing in the conic reformulation (7.4).
x = M.variable('x', 3, Domain.unbounded())
x3 = M.variable()
x4 = M.variable()
The linear constraint is defined using the dot product operator Expr.dot
:
# Create the linear constraint
M.constraint(Expr.dot(x, [1.0, 1.0, 0.5]), Domain.equalsTo(2.0))
The primal power cone is referred to via Domain.inPPowerCone
with an appropriate list of variables or expressions in each case.
# Create the power cone constraints
M.constraint(Var.vstack(x.slice(0,2), x3), Domain.inPPowerCone(0.2))
M.constraint(Expr.vstack(x.index(2), 1.0, x4), Domain.inPPowerCone(0.4))
We only need the objective function:
# Set the objective function
M.objective(ObjectiveSense.Maximize, Expr.dot([1.0,1.0,-1.0], Var.vstack(x3, x4, x.index(0))))
Calling the Model.solve
method invokes the solver:
M.solve()
The primal and dual solution values can be retrieved using Variable.level
, Constraint.level
and Variable.dual
, Constraint.dual
. Here we just display the primal solution
# Get the linear solution values
solx = x.level()
print('x,y,z = %s' % str(solx))
which is
[ 0.06389298 0.78308564 2.30604283 ]
from mosek.fusion import *
with Model('pow1') as M:
x = M.variable('x', 3, Domain.unbounded())
x3 = M.variable()
x4 = M.variable()
# Create the linear constraint
M.constraint(Expr.dot(x, [1.0, 1.0, 0.5]), Domain.equalsTo(2.0))
# Create the power cone constraints
M.constraint(Var.vstack(x.slice(0,2), x3), Domain.inPPowerCone(0.2))
M.constraint(Expr.vstack(x.index(2), 1.0, x4), Domain.inPPowerCone(0.4))
# Set the objective function
M.objective(ObjectiveSense.Maximize, Expr.dot([1.0,1.0,-1.0], Var.vstack(x3, x4, x.index(0))))
# Solve the problem
M.solve()
# Get the linear solution values
solx = x.level()
print('x,y,z = %s' % str(solx))