6.4 Power Cone Optimization¶
The structure of a typical conic optimization problem is
(see Sec. 12 (Problem Formulation and Solutions) for detailed formulations). Here we discuss how to set-up problems with the primal/dual power cones.
MOSEK supports the primal and dual power cones, defined as below:
Primal power cone:
\[\POW_n^{\alpha_k} = \left\{ x\in \real^n ~:~ \prod_{i=0}^{n_\ell-1} x_i^{\beta_i} \geq \sqrt{\sum_{j=n_\ell}^{n-1}x_j^2},\ x_0\ldots,x_{n_\ell-1}\geq 0 \right\}\]where \(s = \sum_i \alpha_i\) and \(\beta_i = \alpha_i / s\), so that \(\sum_i \beta_i=1\).
Dual power cone:
\[(\POW_n^{\alpha_k}) = \left\{ x\in \real^n ~:~ \prod_{i=0}^{n_\ell-1} \left(\frac{x_i}{\beta_i}\right)^{\beta_i} \geq \sqrt{\sum_{j=n_\ell}^{n-1}x_j^2},\ x_0\ldots,x_{n_\ell-1}\geq 0 \right\}\]where \(s = \sum_i \alpha_i\) and \(\beta_i = \alpha_i / s\), so that \(\sum_i \beta_i=1\).
Perhaps the most important special case is the three-dimensional power cone family:
which has the corresponding dual cone:
For example, the conic constraint \((x,y,z)\in\POW_3^{0.25,0.75}\) is equivalent to \(x^{0.25}y^{0.75}\geq |z|\), or simply \(xy^3\geq z^4\) with \(x,y\geq 0\).
For other types of cones supported by MOSEK, see Sec. 15.11 (Supported domains) and the other tutorials in this chapter. Different cone types can appear together in one optimization problem.
6.4.1 Example POW1¶
Consider the following optimization problem which involves powers of variables:
We convert (6.12) into affine conic form using auxiliary variables as bounds for the power expressions:
The two conic constraints shown in (6.13) can be expressed in the ACC form as shown in (6.14):
(6.14)¶\[\begin{split}\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}1&0&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1&0\\0&0&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0&1\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}x_0\\x_1\\x_2\\x_3\\x_4\end{array}\right] + \left[\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\\0\\1\\0\end{array}\right] \in \POW^{0.2,0.8}_3 \times \POW^{0.4,0.6}_3.\end{split}\]
Setting up the linear part
The linear parts (constraints, variables, objective) are set up using exactly the same methods as for linear problems, and we refer to Sec. 6.1 (Linear Optimization) for all the details. The same applies to technical aspects such as defining an optimization task, retrieving the solution and so on.
Setting up the conic constraints
In order to append the conic constraints we first input the matrix \(\afef\) and vector \(\afeg\) which together determine all the six affine expressions appearing in the conic constraints of (6.13)
/* Add conic constraints */
/* Append two power cone domains */
long pc1 = task.appendprimalpowerconedomain(3, new double[]{0.2, 0.8});
long pc2 = task.appendprimalpowerconedomain(3, new double[]{4.0, 6.0});
/* Create data structures F,g so that
F * x + g = (x(0), x(1), x(3), x(2), 1.0, x(4))
*/
task.appendafes(6);
task.putafefentrylist(new long[]{0, 1, 2, 3, 5}, /* Rows */
new int[]{0, 1, 3, 2, 4}, /* Columns */
new double[]{1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0});
task.putafeg(4, 1.0);
/* Append the two conic constraints */
task.appendacc(pc1, /* Domain */
new long[]{0, 1, 2}, /* Rows from F */
null); /* Unused */
task.appendacc(pc2, /* Domain */
new long[]{3, 4, 5}, /* Rows from F */
null); /* Unused */
Following that, each of the affine conic constraints is appended using the function Task.appendacc. The first argument selects the domain, which must be appended before being used, and must have the dimension matching the number of affine expressions appearing in the constraint. In the first case we append the power cone determined by the first three rows of \(\afef\) and \(\afeg\) while in the second call we use the remaining three rows of \(\afef\) and \(\afeg\).
Variants of this method are available to append multiple ACCs at a time. It is also possible to define the matrix \(\afef\) using a variety of methods (row after row, column by column, individual entries, etc.) similarly as for the linear constraint matrix \(A\).
For a more thorough exposition of the affine expression storage (AFE) matrix \(\afef\) and vector \(\afeg\) see Sec. 6.2 (From Linear to Conic Optimization).
Source code
using System;
namespace mosek.example
{
class msgclass : mosek.Stream
{
string prefix;
public msgclass (string prfx)
{
prefix = prfx;
}
public override void streamCB (string msg)
{
Console.Write ("{0}{1}", prefix, msg);
}
}
public class ceo1
{
public static void Main ()
{
const int numcon = 1;
const int numvar = 5; // x,y,z and 2 auxiliary variables for conic constraints
// Since the value infinity is never used, we define
// 'infinity' symbolic purposes only
double infinity = 0;
double[] val = { 1.0, 1.0, -1.0 };
int[] sub = { 3, 4, 0 };
double[] aval = { 1.0, 1.0, 0.5 };
int[] asub = { 0, 1, 2 };
int i;
// Create a task object.
using (mosek.Task task = new mosek.Task()) {
// Directs the log task stream to the user specified
// method msgclass.streamCB
task.set_Stream (mosek.streamtype.log, new msgclass (""));
/* Append 'numcon' empty constraints.
The constraints will initially have no bounds. */
task.appendcons(numcon);
/* Append 'numvar' variables.
The variables will initially be fixed at zero (x=0). */
task.appendvars(numvar);
/* Set up the linear part of the problem */
task.putclist(sub, val);
task.putarow(0, asub, aval);
task.putconbound(0, mosek.boundkey.fx, 2.0, 2.0);
task.putvarboundsliceconst(0,numvar,mosek.boundkey.fr,-infinity,infinity);
/* Add conic constraints */
/* Append two power cone domains */
long pc1 = task.appendprimalpowerconedomain(3, new double[]{0.2, 0.8});
long pc2 = task.appendprimalpowerconedomain(3, new double[]{4.0, 6.0});
/* Create data structures F,g so that
F * x + g = (x(0), x(1), x(3), x(2), 1.0, x(4))
*/
task.appendafes(6);
task.putafefentrylist(new long[]{0, 1, 2, 3, 5}, /* Rows */
new int[]{0, 1, 3, 2, 4}, /* Columns */
new double[]{1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0});
task.putafeg(4, 1.0);
/* Append the two conic constraints */
task.appendacc(pc1, /* Domain */
new long[]{0, 1, 2}, /* Rows from F */
null); /* Unused */
task.appendacc(pc2, /* Domain */
new long[]{3, 4, 5}, /* Rows from F */
null); /* Unused */
task.putobjsense(mosek.objsense.maximize);
task.optimize();
// Print a summary containing information
// about the solution for debugging purposes
task.solutionsummary(mosek.streamtype.msg);
/* Get status information about the solution */
mosek.solsta solsta = task.getsolsta(mosek.soltype.itr);
double[] xx = task.getxx(mosek.soltype.itr); // Interior point solution.
switch (solsta)
{
case mosek.solsta.optimal:
Console.WriteLine ("Optimal primal solution\n");
for (int j = 0; j < 3; ++j)
Console.WriteLine ("x[{0}]: {1}", j, xx[j]);
break;
case mosek.solsta.dual_infeas_cer:
case mosek.solsta.prim_infeas_cer:
Console.WriteLine("Primal or dual infeasibility.\n");
break;
case mosek.solsta.unknown:
Console.WriteLine("Unknown solution status.\n");
break;
default:
Console.WriteLine("Other solution status");
break;
}
}
}
}
}
